May 2015 – letter below for record.
Here is a summary of my concerns for record.
I was a successful businessman – taking a small NZ company internationally into Australia, America, Asia, and Europe, winning two Business Innovation awards and a Highly Commended in the Australian Business Awards.
Creating many jobs and domiciling tax revenue back to NZ.
All this changed when the family court system – refused at every level to assist me in seeing my daughter.
My career was affected and my ability to run an international group of companies was seriously compromised – all because I simply asked for time with my own child and that has been refused at every level.
You talked to me the other day about adherence to the LAW by government departments.
I have followed every direction of the family court system to the letter – I followed the LAW to the LETTER – attending counselling, judicial conferences, obtaining Court orders, presenting my family to court appointed Psychologists which was all very invasive and massively costly for no reward.
I also avoided much provocation to react along the way, and many attempts to destroy my character, reputation and credibility.
The upshot of all this was that Parental Alienation was identified as a significant concern – and there are now TWO psychological reports on record detailing the Severe Harm caused to my child by this ALIENATION. So my complaints were both VALID and VERIFIED by these reports.
Enter Child Support – and the Inland Revenue Service who have facilitated these concerns as they sought Child Support maximums be paid at all costs and against direct evidence that my INCOME had changed significantly.
It is obscene that we have one system ( the family court ) which destroys a mans ability to earn income by NOT enforcing his rights to see his child which is then assisted by a Revenue system that seeks to demand revenue assessed on those same high incomes I have been prevented from earning.
Both systems working in tandem are systemically failing parents and they must be investigated as ONE CONCERN.
Unless of course this is all deliberate with the aim being to destroy parents, children and wealth?
Family Court failings and Child Support concerns raised in my complaint are Symbiotic and mutually exclusive in manifesting the concerns I have detailed. So they must be investigated together, else the concern will remain.
You cannot have ONE system – the Family court destroying a parents right to earn INCOME – and then have the revenue service then Demand payments based on that same INCOME when it is no longer being earned.
There were historically protections for example offered to farmers during divorce to ensure the FARM was not divided up so as to protect the NZ economy – so there is a precedent whereby government recognised the need to protect INCOME generation for the nation.
My case is a similar one in point – you cannot allow a broken system to deliberately destroy good people who are doing good things and creating wealth for this country.
This forms the primary basis of my entire concern here with the ancillary intrusions by child support as they sought to take property as payment for those demands.
If I had been told from the outset that my rights to see my child would never be enforced – I would have forgotten I had a child and moved on doing what I did well – running an international group of companies and earning high incomes.
I should not be penalised for doing the RIGHT THING by my child and simply asking for time with her.
Similarly had my requests been granted and upheld at law – I would have been free to run my company and earn high incomes.
So at every turn, the refusals to permit me to see my child and assist me in doing so are directly related to my reduction in income.
The additional evidence presented as to how Child Support then proceeded to engage in Review hearings which breached all the rights to Due Process, Fairness and natural justice are self explanatory and have been admitted to.
We must also note my concerns with third parties who have been innocent victims in all this – my family, my family trust interests and most of all my children – who have all suffered as a result of the intrusions into their privacy and property.
You have me most recent response to Child Support relating to their ” OFFER” which has NOT been accepted at this time, because it is devoid of any mention of Compensation, Apologies, and reductions based on the fact I was NOT earning the INCOMES the assessments were based on.